Appointing retired High Court judges on ‘ad hoc’ basis

Introduction

The appointment of retired High Court judges on an ad hoc basis is a significant feature of India’s judicial system. This provision is intended to address the pendency of cases and ensure the efficient functioning of courts. It is an important topic for UPSC aspirants as it involves constitutional provisions, judicial reforms, and policy considerations. This eBook provides a detailed analysis of the issue, its legal framework, advantages, challenges, and its relevance to governance and polity.

Constitutional Basis

The appointment of retired High Court judges on an ad hoc basis is governed by Article 224A of the Indian Constitution. This provision states:

The Chief Justice of a High Court may request a retired judge of the same court or another High Court to act as a judge for a temporary period.
The judge’s consent is required, and the President must approve the appointment.

This mechanism is aimed at addressing temporary shortages of judges in High Courts and ensuring uninterrupted judicial proceedings.

Rationale Behind Ad Hoc Appointments

Reducing Case Backlog: High Courts across India face a massive backlog of cases, often leading to delays in the delivery of justice.
Utilizing Expertise: Retired judges bring years of judicial experience, ensuring quality judgments.
Cost-Effective Solution: Ad hoc appointments allow the judiciary to address shortages without creating permanent positions.
Flexibility: These appointments provide a flexible solution to temporary spikes in case volume.

Procedure for Appointment

Identification of Need: The Chief Justice of a High Court identifies the need for additional judges to address case backlogs.
Consultation: Discussions are held with the concerned retired judge and other senior judges of the court.
Consent and Approval: The retired judge’s consent is obtained, and the proposal is sent to the President of India for approval.
Notification: Once approved, an official notification is issued, specifying the terms and duration of the appointment.

Advantages of Ad Hoc Appointments

Quick Redressal of Pendency: These appointments provide immediate relief to overburdened courts.
Retention of Talent: Experienced judges continue to contribute to the judiciary after retirement.
Institutional Memory: Retired judges possess a deep understanding of court processes and local judicial challenges.
Enhanced Access to Justice: Faster case disposal improves access to justice for the common man.

Challenges and Criticisms

Temporary Nature: Ad hoc appointments are a short-term solution and do not address systemic issues like judicial vacancies.
Potential Bias: Concerns may arise about impartiality, especially if retired judges have political affiliations or private interests.
Administrative Hurdles: Delays in obtaining approvals from the President or Ministry of Law and Justice may reduce the efficacy of this provision.
Limited Capacity: Retired judges may not always be physically or mentally equipped to handle a full workload.

Reforms and Recommendations

Streamlining the Process: Reducing bureaucratic delays in the appointment process can improve efficiency.
Clear Guidelines: Establishing criteria for selecting retired judges on an ad hoc basis can ensure transparency and accountability.
Strengthening Judicial Infrastructure: Alongside ad hoc appointments, increasing the sanctioned strength of judges and modernizing court infrastructure is essential.
Periodic Review: Regular assessment of the effectiveness of ad hoc appointments can guide future policy decisions.

Case Studies and Examples

Karnataka High Court: In 2021, the Karnataka High Court utilized Article 224A to appoint retired judges to address case pendency.
Supreme Court Recommendations: The Supreme Court of India has emphasized the need for activating Article 224A in cases of severe backlog, citing it as a constitutional obligation.

Significance for UPSC Aspirants

Governance and Polity: Understanding Article 224A is essential for answering questions on judicial reforms and governance.
Ethics in Judiciary: The ethical considerations in appointing retired judges, including transparency and impartiality, are relevant for ethics case studies.
Current Affairs: Recent developments and judicial pronouncements on this issue are important for both the Prelims and Mains.

Conclusion

The ad hoc appointment of retired High Court judges is a pragmatic solution to address the challenges of pendency and delays in the judiciary. While it is not a panacea for all judicial woes, it reflects the adaptive nature of India’s judicial system in utilizing available resources. For UPSC aspirants, this topic provides an opportunity to understand the interplay of constitutional provisions, policy-making, and judicial administration.

By delving into this issue, aspirants can enhance their understanding of India’s judiciary and its role in ensuring access to justice, thereby enriching their preparation for the Civil Services Examination.

Maximize the benefits of mock tests for IAS and KAS preparation with guidance from Amoghavarsha IAS Academy . For more details, visit https://amoghavarshaiaskas.in/.

Youtube: click here

Amoghavarsha E Magazine

Current Affairs ( Prelims )

Current Affairs ( Mains )

UPSC

KPSC

Appointing retired High Court judges on ‘ad hoc’ basis

Introduction

Constitutional Basis

Rationale Behind Ad Hoc Appointments

Procedure for Appointment

Advantages of Ad Hoc Appointments

Challenges and Criticisms

Reforms and Recommendations

Case Studies and Examples

Significance for UPSC Aspirants

Conclusion

Enroll Now !

Media & News

Similar Articles for UPSC Aspirants

South-South Climate Cooperation

Forest Fires Threat for UPSC

India’s New Immigration and Foreigners Bill, 2025

Paris AI Action Summit for UPSC

Gross Domestic Knowledge Product (GDKP)

Brucellosis Disease

Amoghavarsha IAS KAS

About us

Popular Courses

Contact us