New GEAC Rules Amended for Experts on Genetically Modified Crops

New GEAC Rules Amended for Experts on Genetically Modified Crops

The regulatory framework surrounding genetically modified (GM) crops in India has undergone significant updates with the amendment of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) rules. These changes are pivotal in shaping the future of agricultural biotechnology, food security, and environmental sustainability in the country. For UPSC aspirants, understanding the nuances of these rules is essential, as they intersect with science and technology, environmental governance, and socio-economic development.

Introduction to Genetically Modified Crops

Genetically Modified (GM) crops are plants whose DNA has been altered using genetic engineering techniques to introduce desirable traits such as pest resistance, drought tolerance, or improved nutritional value. Globally, GM crops like Bt cotton, golden rice, and herbicide-tolerant maize have played a significant role in modern agriculture.

In India, GM crops remain a contentious topic due to their potential benefits and risks. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) is the apex regulatory body for approving GM organisms for environmental release and commercial use.

Role of GEAC in Regulating GM Crops

  1. Constitution and Authority

    • The GEAC operates under the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC).
    • It is mandated to assess the environmental and health impacts of GM organisms and approve their large-scale release.
  2. Functions of GEAC

    • Evaluating proposals for field trials of GM crops.
    • Monitoring safety protocols during trials and commercial deployment.
    • Advising the government on policies related to genetic engineering.
  3. Stakeholders

    • Includes scientists, representatives from government departments, and members from civil society organizations.

Key Amendments to GEAC Rules

  1. Expert Panel Composition

    • Enhanced participation of domain experts in areas such as biotechnology, agriculture, ecology, and health sciences.
    • Greater emphasis on multi-disciplinary expertise to ensure holistic evaluations.
  2. Streamlined Approval Process

    • Simplification of the procedural framework for approving field trials of GM crops.
    • Introduction of time-bound evaluations to prevent delays in decision-making.
  3. Public Consultation

    • Greater transparency through mandatory public hearings for GM crop approvals.
    • Opportunities for stakeholders, including farmers and environmental groups, to present their views.
  4. Data Sharing and Reporting

    • Enhanced requirements for data transparency, including public access to trial results and risk assessments.
  5. Focus on Biosafety

    • Strengthened guidelines for environmental risk assessments, including potential impacts on biodiversity and non-target organisms.
  6. Monitoring and Compliance

    • Improved mechanisms for post-approval monitoring to ensure adherence to safety protocols.

Implications of the Amended Rules

  • 1. Advancing Agricultural Innovation
    • The revised rules aim to foster research and innovation in agricultural biotechnology.
    • Faster approvals can encourage the development of GM crops tailored to India’s agricultural challenges, such as drought-resistant or pest-resistant varieties.
    2. Strengthening Biosafety
    • Enhanced focus on environmental and health risk assessments addresses concerns regarding the unintended consequences of GM crops.
    3. Boosting Food Security
    • GM crops with higher yields and resilience to climate change can play a critical role in ensuring food security for India’s growing population.
    4. Encouraging Public Trust
    • Increased transparency and public engagement can help bridge the trust deficit between stakeholders and the government.
    5. Balancing Global Commitments
    • Aligning regulations with international biosafety protocols like the Cartagena Protocol ensures compliance with global trade and environmental standards.

Challenges in Implementing the New Rules

  1. Opposition from Civil Society

    • Environmental and farmer groups continue to oppose GM crops, citing potential risks to biodiversity, human health, and traditional farming practices.
  2. Complexity of Risk Assessments

    • Assessing the long-term ecological and health impacts of GM crops remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive data.
  3. Farmer Concerns

    • Fear of dependency on multinational seed companies and increased input costs can deter farmer acceptance.
  4. Regulatory Bottlenecks

    • Despite procedural streamlining, overlapping roles of different ministries and agencies can cause delays.
  5. Public Awareness

    • Limited understanding of GM technology among the general population can lead to misinformation and resistance.

Global Practices and Lessons for India

  1. United States

    • The US adopts a product-based approach, where GM crops are regulated based on their characteristics rather than the process of genetic modification.
  2. European Union

    • The EU follows a precautionary principle, with stringent regulations and labeling requirements for GM products.
  3. Brazil

    • Brazil has a robust framework for GM crop approvals, including public consultations and biosafety evaluations.
  4. China

    • China has invested heavily in GM research while maintaining strict control over commercialization to address domestic food security concerns.

India can learn from these models to create a balanced regulatory framework that fosters innovation while ensuring biosafety and public trust.

Relevance for UPSC Aspirants

  1. Science and Technology

    • Questions on the mechanism of genetic engineering, its applications, and associated risks are frequent in GS Paper III.
  2. Environment and Biodiversity

    • The impact of GM crops on ecosystems and biodiversity connects to GS Paper III themes.
  3. Agriculture and Economy

    • The role of GM crops in enhancing productivity and food security links to GS Paper III and Essay topics.
  4. Ethics and Society

    • Ethical considerations surrounding genetic modification can appear in Ethics papers and essays.
  5. Current Affairs

    • Recent developments in GEAC rules make this topic relevant for Prelims and Mains.

Conclusion

The amended GEAC rules mark a significant step towards fostering innovation in agricultural biotechnology while addressing concerns about biosafety and public participation. For India, GM crops hold the potential to transform agriculture, enhance food security, and mitigate the impacts of climate change. However, a balanced approach that prioritizes transparency, inclusivity, and environmental protection is essential.

For UPSC aspirants, the topic encapsulates the interplay between science, governance, and socio-economic development, offering valuable insights into India’s regulatory landscape and its implications for sustainable growth.

Maximize the benefits of mock tests for IAS and KAS preparation with guidance from Amoghavarsha IAS Academy . For more details, visit https://amoghavarshaiaskas.in/.

Youtube: click here

Enroll Now !
Media & News
Similar Articles for UPSC Aspirants