The discrepancy between satellite data of farm fires and air pollution

The Discrepancy Between Satellite Data on Farm Fires and Air Pollution: A Guide for UPSC Aspirants

Air pollution is a pressing issue in India, particularly during the winter months when incidents of stubble burning in northern states like Punjab, Haryana, and Uttar Pradesh exacerbate air quality. The phenomenon of farm fires is often closely monitored using satellite data, which provides insights into their frequency and intensity. However, there is often a noticeable discrepancy between the satellite-recorded data on farm fires and the observed levels of air pollution.

For UPSC aspirants, understanding this gap is crucial for addressing questions on environmental governance, technology in policymaking, and sustainable agricultural practices. This eBook explores the causes of this discrepancy, its implications, and strategies for bridging the gap.

Understanding Farm Fires and Air Pollution

1. What are Farm Fires?
Farm fires, commonly referred to as stubble burning, occur when farmers burn agricultural residue—mainly paddy straw—left behind after harvesting. This practice is widespread in northern India due to mechanized harvesting, which leaves stalks that are costly and labor-intensive to remove.

2. Contribution to Air Pollution:
Stubble burning releases harmful pollutants, including:

  • Particulate Matter (PM2.5 and PM10)
  • Carbon monoxide (CO)
  • Methane (CH4)
  • Nitrogen oxides (NOx)
  • Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

These pollutants worsen air quality, particularly in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, where meteorological conditions like low wind speeds and temperature inversions trap pollutants.

Satellite Data and Farm Fires

Satellites equipped with remote sensing technology detect heat signatures from active fires. Tools like the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) capture farm fire data, providing real-time maps of fire hotspots.

Advantages of Satellite Data:
  1. Wide Coverage: Satellites can monitor large geographical areas, including remote locations.
  2. Real-Time Updates: Data is updated frequently, allowing for timely interventions.
  3. Cost-Effectiveness: Satellite monitoring reduces the need for extensive ground surveys.

Despite these benefits, satellite data is not always perfectly aligned with observed air quality, leading to a discrepancy.

Causes of the Discrepancy

  • Meteorological Factors:

    • Wind Patterns: Air pollutants can travel long distances. Farm fires in Punjab may contribute to air pollution in Delhi due to wind direction, even if local fire counts are low.
    • Temperature Inversions: During winter, the trapping of pollutants near the ground exacerbates air pollution, independent of fire intensity.
    • Humidity Levels: High humidity can increase the hygroscopic growth of particulate matter, worsening air quality.
  • Variability in Emission Estimates: Satellite data provides a count of fire incidents but does not quantify the precise amount of emissions. Factors like the type of crop residue, moisture content, and burning conditions can significantly influence the actual pollutant release.

  • Limitations of Satellite Technology:

    • Resolution Constraints: Satellites may miss smaller fires or those obscured by clouds or smoke.
    • Time Gaps: Satellite overpasses occur at specific intervals, potentially missing intermittent or short-duration fires.
    • Data Calibration: Variations in satellite sensors and algorithms may lead to under- or overestimation of fire intensity.
  • Non-Fire Sources of Pollution:

    • Urban emissions from vehicles, industries, and construction activities contribute significantly to air pollution.
    • Domestic biomass burning, often overlooked, can rival or exceed farm fire emissions in some areas.
    • Diwali fireworks during the same period as peak stubble burning further cloud the attribution.
  • Cumulative Effects: Air pollution is cumulative, with multiple sources interacting. A single pollutant source, like farm fires, may not fully explain observed pollution levels, especially when compounded by local and regional emissions.

Implications of the Discrepancy

  • Policy Challenges: The discrepancy complicates policymaking, as it creates uncertainty about the proportionate responsibility of farm fires in overall pollution. Policies targeting stubble burning may face opposition if perceived as unfairly attributing blame.

  • Public Perception: Public discourse often disproportionately blames farmers for pollution, overshadowing other contributors like urban emissions. This can alienate farming communities and hinder cooperative solutions.

  • Judicial Interventions: Courts have frequently directed governments to act against stubble burning, but discrepancies in data may undermine the effectiveness of such rulings.

  • Global Implications: India’s reliance on satellite data for international reporting (e.g., under the Paris Agreement) may require reconciliation of such discrepancies to ensure credibility and accuracy.

Strategies to Bridge the Gap

  • Improving Satellite Data:

    • Higher Resolution Sensors: Investing in satellites with finer spatial and temporal resolution can improve fire detection accuracy.
    • Data Integration: Combining satellite data with ground-based observations and meteorological models can provide a holistic understanding.
    • Advanced Algorithms: Using AI and machine learning to analyze satellite imagery can enhance accuracy in detecting and quantifying fires.
  • Comprehensive Air Quality Monitoring:

    • Expanding the network of ground-based air quality sensors to measure pollutants in real time.
    • Incorporating data from multiple sources, including industrial and vehicular emissions, into pollution assessments.
  • Targeted Policy Measures:

    • Incentivizing alternatives to stubble burning, such as in-situ decomposition using bio-enzymes or machinery like Happy Seeders.
    • Promoting crop diversification to reduce reliance on paddy cultivation, which generates large quantities of stubble.
  • Public Awareness and Farmer Support:

    • Educating farmers about the environmental impact of stubble burning.
    • Providing financial and logistical support to adopt sustainable practices.
  • Seasonal Action Plans:

    • Implementing graded response action plans (GRAPs) to tackle pollution spikes, accounting for both farm fires and non-farm sources.
    • Enhancing interstate coordination to manage cross-border pollution flow.

Conclusion

The discrepancy between satellite data on farm fires and air pollution underscores the complexity of environmental management in India. While satellite technology is a powerful tool for monitoring and policymaking, it must be complemented by ground-based observations, robust data integration, and a nuanced understanding of pollution sources.

For UPSC aspirants, this topic provides insights into the interplay of technology, environmental policy, and social dynamics. A balanced approach, recognizing both the strengths and limitations of satellite data, is essential for crafting effective solutions to India’s air pollution crisis.

By addressing these gaps, India can not only improve its air quality but also set an example for leveraging technology in sustainable development—an important theme in the UPSC syllabus.

Maximize the benefits of mock tests for IAS and KAS preparation with guidance from Amoghavarsha IAS Academy . For more details, visit https://amoghavarshaiaskas.in/.

Youtube: click here

Enroll Now !
Media & News
Similar Articles for UPSC Aspirants