Trump signs executive order to end US birthright citizenship

Understanding Birthright Citizenship

Constitutional Basis
The 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868, states:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”

This clause, historically designed to grant citizenship to former slaves, has been interpreted broadly to include virtually all individuals born on U.S. soil.

Jus Soli vs. Jus Sanguinis

Jus Soli (Right of the Soil): Citizenship is granted based on birth location.

Jus Sanguinis (Right of Blood): Citizenship is granted based on the nationality of parents.

The U.S. follows jus soli, while many other countries, including India, primarily follow jus sanguinis with some modifications.

Trump's Executive Order

The Executive Order’s Objectives
Trump argued that birthright citizenship incentivized illegal immigration and “birth tourism,” wherein foreign nationals enter the U.S. to give birth, ensuring automatic citizenship for their child. The executive order aimed to redefine the 14th Amendment’s jurisdiction clause to exclude children born to non-citizens and unauthorized immigrants.

Trump’s administration contended that:

The term “subject to the jurisdiction” does not extend to individuals without legal status.

The existing interpretation of the 14th Amendment had been overly expansive and was not consistent with its original intent.

Legal and Constitutional Challenges

Judicial Precedents

  • United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): This landmark case affirmed that children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents were U.S. citizens under the 14th Amendment.
  • Critics of the executive order argue that overturning this precedent would require a constitutional amendment rather than executive action.

The Role of the Judiciary
Given the constitutional implications, any such executive order would likely face immediate legal challenges. The ultimate decision would rest with the Supreme Court, raising questions about judicial interpretation of originalism vs. living constitutionalism.

Implications of Ending Birthright Citizenship

For the U.S.

Demographic Shifts: Limiting birthright citizenship could lead to a rise in stateless individuals and create barriers to integration for children born to non-citizens.

Immigration Policy: It could deter illegal immigration but might also lead to complex legal battles and enforcement issues.

Economic Impact: Restricting citizenship could affect industries reliant on immigrant labor and alter population growth trends.

 For International Norms
The U.S. would align with countries that have restricted birthright citizenship, such as Germany and Japan. However, it could face criticism for deviating from inclusive democratic principles.

Comparison with India’s Citizenship Laws

Birthright Citizenship in India
India initially followed a jus soli approach but amended its laws to incorporate stricter jus sanguinis principles:

  • Citizenship Act, 1955: Granted citizenship to anyone born in India.
  • Amendments (1986 & 2003): Restricted citizenship, requiring at least one parent to be an Indian citizen and the other not an illegal migrant.

Lessons for India
Trump’s executive order highlights debates over immigration and citizenship that resonate with India’s own challenges, such as the implementation of the NRC (National Register of Citizens) and the CAA (Citizenship Amendment Act).

Broader Implications for Global Governance

Sovereignty vs. Universal Rights
Ending birthright citizenship raises questions about the balance between national sovereignty and adherence to universal human rights principles.

 Statelessness Concerns
Restricting citizenship by birth could exacerbate the global issue of statelessness, leaving individuals without nationality or legal protections.

Relevance for UPSC Aspirants

Topics to Focus On

  • Polity and Constitution: Comparative analysis of citizenship laws in India and the U.S.
  • International Relations: U.S. immigration policies and their global impact.
  • Ethics and Governance: Balancing national interests with humanitarian considerations.
  • Social Issues: The role of citizenship in identity, integration, and social cohesion.

Essay and Mains Questions

  • “Discuss the implications of restricting birthright citizenship on national security and global human rights.”
  • “Analyze the relevance of the U.S. birthright citizenship debate for India’s evolving citizenship policies.”

Conclusion

Trump’s executive order to end birthright citizenship underscores a significant ideological and constitutional debate in the U.S. It reflects broader global trends where nations grapple with issues of identity, sovereignty, and inclusion.

For UPSC aspirants, understanding such developments provides insights into the interplay between law, policy, and governance. It emphasizes the importance of constitutional safeguards, judicial interpretation, and ethical considerations in shaping inclusive societies.

In a world of increasing mobility and migration, the debate over birthright citizenship serves as a reminder of the complexities surrounding national identity and the universal rights of individuals.

Maximize the benefits of mock tests for IAS and KAS preparation with guidance from Amoghavarsha IAS Academy . For more details, visit https://amoghavarshaiaskas.in/.

Youtube: click here

Enroll Now !
Media & News
Similar Articles for UPSC Aspirants